Virtual Meeting To Decide Unpopular Cobbold Mews Plan

42 housing units to be built on site currently used as car park

Virtual Meeting To Decide Unpopular Cobbold Mews Plan
CGI of scheme submitted by developer with their application


55 Storey Skyscraper Approved for North Acton

Backlash Over 25-Storey 'Overdevelopment' On Bollo Lane

Sign up for our Acton newsletter

Comment on this story on the

A plan for a mews style development on the border of Chiswick and Acton is to be considered by a virtual meeting of the Ealing planning committee this week.

42 flats and houses are proposed for the 0.51 hectare ex-railway site to the north of Greenend Road which is currently used as a car park. The application has proved controversial particular because many existing residents of the area were allocated a parking space at the site as part of their lease which will not be available to them during construction. There have been 278 comments on the plan which overwhelmingly are objections and most from either Greenend Road or the recently built flats along Warple Way.

The part 4 storey, part three story building will mainly comprise one and two bedroom flats. There will be two communal gardens, a children’s play area and 6 of the flats will have roof terraces.

There will be 135 parking spaces on the site when the development is completed, 103 related to the section 106 agreement with existing residents of the Old Factory Quarter. Some of the new spaces will be underground.

There will be 135 parking spaces on the site when the development is completed Cobbold Mews
The site as it is currently

The site is next to storm tanks which are part of sewage works operated by Thames Water. The water company objected to the development saying that no odour survey was submitted with the application. Subsequently the applicant submitted a survey which concluded residents would not be affected by any significant odour and that, in any case, Thames Water was working to improve the situation. The report states that the odour sniff tests found that, at worst, the most intense food related odours were classified as Intensity Odour Strength 3, which is described as a distinct odour that is barely recognisable. It was recommended the development included highly fragranced climbing plants and fragranced plants in areas of landscaping.

Thames Water also pointed out that the applicant’s Planning Statement describes the proposed properties as having an ‘open visual outlook when their view will be across an operational sewage pumping station/storm tanks site, some of which are uncovered.

Chair of Southfield Park Triangle Residents’ Association, Don Tanswell, said, "It is also not reasonable or fair to place this on the agenda of the first virtual meeting of the Planning committee meeting."

Ealing’s planning officers are recommending that permission should be granted dismissing nearby residents’ concerns about loss of light or privacy. They say, “On balance it is considered unlikely that the development would result in an adverse impact on residential amenity to such an extent that warrant refusal. The planning reference is 193680FUL.

Some local residents’ groups believe that Ealing Council’s arrangements for the publicity of planning applications during the lockdown has been inadequate. The public notices for developments like this one are published in a newspaper which does not circulate in the area which is a requirement of the relevant legislation. The Council have refused to consider the publication of notices in sites like and even though the current guidance from the government is to increase the use of digital media to make residents aware of developments that may affect them. Ealing Council say that if they were to publish notices digitally they would do so on their own site.

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.


May 16, 2020


Bookmark and Share