Cap The Towers Blasts Committee That Approved Friary Park Plan

Says ignoring Fire Brigade advice 'disrespectful' to the Grenfell victims


Sean Fletcher described the decision to approve the scheme as a 'disgrace'

Participate

Increase in Size of Friary Park Scheme Approved by Ealing Council

Friary Park Scheme 'Cannot Proceed' Due to FoI Rule Breach

Time Running Out To Comment on New Friary Park Plans

Proposal To Increase Height of Friary Park Scheme Ditched

Friary Park Development Doomed Say Opponents

TV Presenter Leads Criticism of Friary Park Plans

Big Height Increase Proposed for Friary Park Towers

Allegations of Duplicity Over True Scale of Friary Park Redevelopment

Private Developer Brought in to Friary Park Project

Tower Blocks For Friary Park

Sign up for our Acton newsletter

Comment on this story on the

Local campaign group Cap The Towers has issued a statement fiercely criticising the councillors and officers involved in the recent approval for an expansion of the Friary Park development which is to be known as the Verdean.

The revised plan includes tall towers with only a single staircase, a kind of design that London Fire Brigade (LFB) is currently advising against.

At the planning committee meeting on 19 October, nine councillors accepted a recommendation from planning officers that Mount Anvil’s and Catalyst’s joint proposal to build towers in this way should be accepted. Only Cllr Julian Gallant voted against the application.

LFB had comment on the application as a stakeholder telling Ealing Council that it should consider ‘multiple staircases a fundamental requirement for tall residential buildings.’

Cap The Towers said following the decision, “How disrespectful to the memory of the 72 people who died at Grenfell and all those who still mourn their loss, that a neighbouring borough should deliberately set a lower standard of fire safety than the London Fire Brigade recommends. “

The group claims that LFB’s comments were sent to the council in September but initially were not published on the council’s web site until lawyers told them that doing so was obligatory.

Cap The Towers continues, “It is widely recognised - following the disaster of Grenfell - that the London Fire Brigade’s insistence on ‘multiple staircases in tall residential buildings’ is very likely to become law, maybe as early as January. Hence the rush to get this application passed before
new regulations come in.”

Sean Fletcher, who spoke on behalf of objectors at the planning meeting, described Ealing Council’s handling of this fire safety issue as ‘a disgrace’ and called for this ‘dreadful and misguided’ decision to be reversed.

A council spokesperson said: “The wellbeing and safety of residents are at the heart of decision-making at Ealing Council.

“All aspects of the Friary Park planning application, including matters of fire safety have been subject to extensive consideration from Ealing’s planning committee. Furthermore, there have been discussions with the London Fire Brigade regarding the fire safety aspect of the planning application, and as part of the approval process for this development, aspects of the plans were submitted to the Building Control Authority. The Building Control authority have considered the development in respect to Part B (Fire Safety) and as part of their inter-service procedural guidance consulted with the Fire Authority. These details have been approved by the Building Control Authority.

“Furthermore, the applicant has also provided a declaration of compliance that the fire safety of the proposed development and the fire safety information submitted satisfy the requirements of Policies D12(A) and D5(B5) as requested by the GLA.”

The reference for the scheme on the Ealing Council planning portal is 221747HYBRID.

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.

November 2, 2022

 

 

Bookmark and Share